deliberative democracy and shi’i jurisprudential theory of na’ini investigation of an epistemological possibility for approaching form a right-duty based shi’a jurisprudence to the deliberative democracy

نویسندگان

عبدالمجید مبلغی

استادیار پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی

چکیده

this paper investigates the possibility of attending to iran’s constitutional shi’i jurisprudence as a perspective for approaching toward deliberative democracy. it claims there is an epistemological potentiality where it is possible to think of the theory of deliberative democracy from a specific islamic shi’i jurisprudential theory stated by mirza mohammad hossein na’ini (1890-1939) during the iranian constitutional revolution (1905–1911). it focuses on some epistemological similarities between shi’a jurisprudential theory of na’ini and habermas understands of deliberative democracy. the paper argues that both theories rely on a method that systematically centralize “justice” and “freedom” as main pillars of a framework by which they define a conceivable, and consequently, an acceptable law-based ideal society. the paper results even though these disciplines are different in describing their final and ideal society still this approach is worthwhile, since it provides us with an epistemological possibility and, based on that, with a methodological chance to think of an islamic jurisprudence theory as a background for approaching to a version of deliberative democracy.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Pharmacopolitics and deliberative democracy.

Setting priorities in healthcare has become a highly politicised activity. Traditionally it has been undertaken by government and the health professions but there is an increasing imperative to involve the public. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has established a Citizens' Council as an attempt to capture the informed views of the public in shaping the Institute...

متن کامل

Game Theory, Information, and Deliberative Democracy

We contend that, with a suitably broad notion of rationality and a diverse set of motivations, the game-theoretic tradition is particularly well suited for generating insights about effects of deliberative institutions and that progress in the development of deliberative democratic theory hinges on making proper sense of the relationship between game-theoretic and normative theoretic approaches...

متن کامل

Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy

Screen and song celebrate social justice movements that protested in the streets when they were convinced that existing institutions and their normal procedures only reinforced the status quo. Many rights have been won in democratic societies by means of courageous activism — the eight hour day, votes for women, the right to sit at any lunch counter. Yet contemporary democratic theory rarely re...

متن کامل

Deliberative Democracy, Chicago Style

1. The Strange Appearance of Deliberative Democracy Chicago's neighborhoods might strike both casual observers and the initiated as rather infertile ground for the seeds of deliberative democracy to take root and bear fruit. The city's tradition of machine politics—a reward system that delivers spoils in exchange for obedience—hardly seems conducive to a politics that relies upon fairness and r...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
سیاست

جلد ۴۶، شماره ۲، صفحات ۴۲۳-۴۳۹

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023